When will wold war III be?

Have a guess. (Made this cuz of great inactivity here)
I mean it was like 1914-1918 and 1939-1945 Should be sometime near cuz it's been like 53 years since the last one.

I guess around ~2022

I say we run out of oil in between 10 and 20 years. And WW3 will come hand in hand with that.

That around where I guessed but, I think it will be war beacuse of countries like America want the last remaining oil and not when it's depleted.

US has done some very fucked up things in the east. Just thinking of good old Hussein and his Kuwait invasion.
America has taken the freedom to cause chaos everywhere. Though I have no idea what the next US president will do. If it keeps going on like this I believe America will not only go against the east, but eventually also against the west. Considering the massive funds that run into the US "defense" forces I believe they also could win (allied with GB?). Or just paranoia?

Well I think the new presiden will be afraid to go offensive even more cuz The people are very upset right now. I think they'll pull back their forces in Irak. Though if they attacked west I don't think they'll get help from GB cuz they have just reduced their ammunt of troops that are on standby. But I guess they can get the back pretty quick.

Yes, I do also believe/hope that USA will refrain from invading and waging war and reduce their activity to war relief.
I wonder what kind acts of terror we can await in the future --

Well no racism here but I think we'll get more and more terrorism from Islam Belivers cuz They'll Jihad us all you know.

We'll soon be in a dead end.

Hmmm dead end? True, soon the world will be so poluted that we won't be able to breath anymore. Ohhh a real life stalker. That'd be sweet. I think I'll find a lot of artifacts and buy myself an empire.

Played too much Stalker, I believe
Duh, I think pollution will not be the most important fact. But the climate change will give us (or at least a lot of countries) the rest.

US attacking the west?

I just hope McCain won't win the election, you can virtually see the arms industry speaking through him. At least that's my impression when I hear him or read his texts. That reminds me that I haven't followed the spectacle for the last two weeks - someone knows some rough predictions?

Anyway, people shouldn't make an apocalypse out of the "climate change". In my opinion, it's not a fact at all that it's caused by evil, evil humans again and besides that, many people proclaim as well a few degrees more would have more positive effects than negative - if it even exists after all. And who knows what happens once all the oil is almost depleted or it becomes to expensive to flow it, and alternate energy sources haven't been found for the masses.

[sarcasm]Extremists, terror, oil, climate or Iran - take your pick and enjoy our millenium.[/sarcasm]
+bucktooth

Odds are against McCain. I think Obama is leading right now?

I would vote for Obama, too.

ww 3 has already started that's all I got to say. Period.

ww3? pretty soon (talkin about every nation conflicts xD)... but think about the outcome now xD almost each small nation from which capital you can almost see borders of it has enough money to found their own nuclear weapon... now think what could it be for us (at least for me xD) living far away from centre of country, far away from any strategic point that should be taken priority of? Free goods everywhere! xD if something would occure, all country bums like me would be only surviving people throught the world, long live the country!

Sunny_D wrote:
Anyway, people shouldn't make an apocalypse out of the "climate change". In my opinion, it's not a fact at all that it's caused by evil, evil humans again and besides that, many people proclaim as well a few degrees more would have more positive effects than negative - if it even exists after all

Today's news: Big flood in china. Several million $ damage. 180,000 homeless.
10th June: Flood in Wisconsin, USA. Several hundred people homeless. Dam failures due to all the water expected.
14th June: Level7 earthquake in Japan. 6 dead, several hundred injured. A nuclear power plant got damaged and radioactive water leaked. There were more than 150 small aftershocks.
14th June: Flood in Des Moines, Iowa, USA. 20 dead. Parts of South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Nebraska, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Oklahoma and Arkansas are flooded, too.
25th May: Tornado in the same area. Probably the cause of the flood.
8th-12th June: Heat warnings from Carolina to Connecticut. Record temperatures of almost 40 degrees.

And that are only some of the most recent. The numbers of catastrophes has multiplied by 10 within the last decades. Who cares about one or two degrees?

s3rius wrote:And that are only some of the most recent. The numbers of catastrophes has multiplied by 10 within the last decades. Who cares about one or two degrees?

your neighbouring country that is hotter than yours, they'll invade to move and get in a better climate
WW3 will be about cooling down ^_^

[quote="Mishotaki"]

s3rius wrote:they'll invade to move and get in a better climate

Not if the flood hits them first +unimpressed

But how is this list of "events" connected to global warming? What makes you so sure this is the reason for all this? Furthermore, the weather and the climate is an immensely complex and highly dynamic system - why should the amount of "catastrophes" be a constant number? Could it probably be that these things always happened and just affect more people today? And not to speak about TV and the internet that hype everything they can find... the result is just a 'felt' increase, in my eyes.

Who cares about one or two degrees?

I care about not surfing on a popular wave just because it's popular.

Guys you've done it again. I'm pretty sure this is offtopic.

See that tiny, tiny, thin twine in this story? Yes, that's the connection between WW3 and climate change.
+eyebrows

*tries to abscont*

Hmmmm I think I can see the connection.... NO.

From WWIII to climatic problems isn't a long way of thoughts.

s3rius wrote:From WWIII to climatic problems isn't a long way of thoughts.

true true... soon enough by 2050 when everybody have to compulsory get an air-conditioner, which results to more global warming, more temperature rising.... hmmm has anyone thought of living in other planets or space? perhaps we may live underwater, if you have a choice which will you go?

Lisianthus wrote:Guys you've done it again. I'm pretty sure this is offtopic.

let me show you how it is linked from my topic... everyone will be fighting a space in other planets... whereas living in underwater will threaten marine life, so the war will be waged with marine specialists and conservationists.......

No one is for sure be able to predict accurately about the future.... who knows....

Dooh, I completely overlooked that post D:

Sunny_D wrote:But how is this list of "events" connected to global warming? What makes you so sure this is the reason for all this? Furthermore, the weather and the climate is an immensely complex and highly dynamic system - why should the amount of "catastrophes" be a constant number? Could it probably be that these things always happened and just affect more people today? And not to speak about TV and the internet that hype everything they can find... the result is just a 'felt' increase, in my eyes.

Of course the number of those incidents is not constant, but that this number is constantly rising during the past 40 or so years is.. how do you say.. ein Wink mit dem Zaunpfahl We cannot be sure, but this guy got a nice arguement fitting to that topic:
http://www.break.com/index/tough-to-argue.html